Deadline all the time

breaking news stories, photos, and video

Archive for October 29th, 2007

No statements from detained Rangers without lawyers present

leave a comment »

By Joel Guinto
INQUIRER.net
Last updated 03:59pm (Mla time) 10/29/2007

MANILA, Philippines — Fourteen Army Scout Rangers detained even without formal charges for their alleged participation in a supposed coup plot in February 2006 coup refused on Monday to give their statements to investigators on the advise of their lawyer.

The Scout Rangers’ lawyer, Vicente Verdadero, said he advised the 14 elite troopers not to give any statement since they were not accompanied by civilian counsel when investigators from the Army Inspector General went to their detention cells at Camp Capinpin in Tanay town, Rizal province.

“They cannot be investigated without a lawyer,” Verdadero said in a phone interview.

It was the first time the statements of the 14 enlisted men have been sought since they were detained in mid-2006, Army spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Ernesto Torres Jr. said.

Torres said a “shortage of manpower” at the Army Inspector General delayed the investigation of the enlisted men and that cases of human rights abuse, including those involving retired major general Jovito Palparan, had taken first priority.

“But we have reports coming from their units that would warrant their investigation on this case,” Torres said in a separate interview.

Torres refused to elaborate on the “reports” but said they showed “prima facie evidence for their complicity in the February 2006 destabilization [plot].”

On Thursday, 26 fellow detainees of the 14 Scout Rangers were discharged from service after the Philippine Army said there was a “preponderance of evidence” that they violated Articles of War 67 (mutiny) and 97 (conduct prejudicial to good order and military discipline).

Torres said the detainees agreed to have their statements taken, with their lawyer present, on November 9.

“We’re still hoping they cooperate in the investigation…process in order to have a speedy impartial investigation…Their statements will be taken with the hope of probably mitigating them from the case,” he said.

The 14 enlisted men were allegedly part of a plot to declare a mass withdrawal of support from President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo on February 24, 2006, the 20th anniversary of the 1986 People Power uprising that toppled the Marcos dictatorship.

Twenty-eight officers — 19 Scout Rangers, the rest Marines — are facing court martial for mutiny and are also detained in Camp Capinpin.

View article as posted on INQUIRER.net

Advertisements

Written by joelguinto

Mon+00:002007-10-29T08:35:55+00:00+00:0010b+00:00Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:35:55 +0000 22, 2006 at 12:45 am10

Posted in Uncategorized

AFP insists Querubin detention in order

leave a comment »

By Joel Guinto
INQUIRER.net
Last updated 03:14pm (Mla time) 10/29/2007

MANILA, Philippines — The military insists there is “nothing irregular” about the detention of a Marine colonel linked to an alleged coup plot in February 2006, even as the Court of Appeals granted his wife’s petition for habeas corpus.

Even if Armed Forces chief of staff General Hermogenes Esperon Jr. did not sign the pre-trial advice (PTA) for Colonel Ariel Querubin and his 27 co-accused, he enclosed with it a “memorandum” ordering the convening of a court martial to try the said officers for mutiny, military spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Bartolome Bacarro said.

In her habeas corpus petition, Querubin’s wife, Maria Flor, said the military had no basis to detain her husband since Esperon did not sign the PTA.

The PTA is a document prepared by Esperon’s staff judge advocate that reversed recommendations by pre-trial investigators not to charge any of the officers with mutiny.

“There is nothing irregular about it [Querubin’s detention] if you look at it from the perspective of the military justice system,” Bacarro told reporters in Camp Aguinaldo.

“It is not necessary [for Esperon] to sign the PTA. He attached a memorandum [ordering] the creation of a court martial,” Bacarro added.

Bacarro gave no assurances that Querubin would be presented to the court during the November 8 hearing of the habeas corpus petition, saying it was up to the Solicitor General who will represent the military in the case.

In a separate interview with reporters, Mrs Querubin said her husband was “so happy” with the appellate court’s ruling, especially since it came several days after she filed the habeas corpus petition.

Querubin said she was also eager to for a face-off in court with Esperon, who has been asked by the court to appear on the November 8 hearing.

“It’s the first time I filed a case against anyone. I’m hoping Ill see Esperon there on November 8. I’ve seen him from afar but never up close,” she said.

“If they base merits we have a good case here…the signature on the PTI is important; until now its unsigned,” she said.

Querubin, and ex-Army Scout Rangers chief Brigadier General Danilo Lim allegedly planned a mass withdrawal of support from President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo on February 24, 2006, to coincide with street protests to mark the 20th anniversary of the 1986 People Power uprising.

Ex-Marine commandant Major General Renato Miranda, the highest-ranking accused before the general court martial, allegedly knew of the plot.

View article as posted on INQUIRER.net

Written by joelguinto

Mon+00:002007-10-29T07:50:48+00:00+00:0010b+00:00Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:50:48 +0000 22, 2006 at 12:45 am10

Posted in Uncategorized